This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

More maintainers


I'm concerned that there aren't enough eCos maintainers to
go around.

There are *trivial* patches that take much too long to get
any sort of attention. This is bad for eCos.

What's an acceptable turnaround for a trivial patch?

I'd say a week is longish, two weeks is a patch dropped on
the floor effectively.

I'm not asking that the current maintainers should spend more
time on eCos, but I am asking that more maintainers are
recruited.

I haven't made any statistics, nor do I track what patches should
have been committed, but here is a trival patch:

http://sourceware.org/ml/ecos-patches/2009-09/msg00016.html

What's the best way forward here?


-- 
Ãyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting services
http://www.zylin.com

--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]