This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Xscale cores

From: Mark Salter <msalter at redhat dot com>
To: Slide <slide dot o dot mix at gmail dot com>
Cc: ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:19:22 -0500
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Xscale cores
References: <a623f7d11002090958t3df22301u81bfc41e7c56749a@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 10:58 -0700, Slide wrote:
> The newer Marvell Xscale processors (PXA3xx and PXA9xx) have a newer
> version of the Xscale core compared to the PXA2x0 series. I'm am
> working on porting eCos to the newer cores, but am wondering what
> directory structure would be best for supporting both versions of the
> core. Currently there is an xscale/cores directory under the arm hal
> area, but I don't know how to split this up the best way. Can anyone
> point me to another architecture that has solved an issue like this
> already?

What are the, um, core differences?

--Mark



-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- Xscale cores
  - From: Slide

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]