This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: [ECOS] sources.redhat.com downtime
- From: Fabrice Gautier <Fabrice_Gautier at sdesigns dot com>
- To: "'ecos-discuss at sourceware dot org'" <ecos-discuss at sourceware dot org>, Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
- Cc: eCos discussion <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>, eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:37:11 -0800
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] sources.redhat.com downtime
Are they going to upgrade the cvs server to a new version of cvs also?
I remember the current one has an annoying bug when making diff (If i
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:32 PM
> To: Jonathan Larmour
> Cc: eCos discussion; eCos Maintainers
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] sources.redhat.com downtime
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:57:06PM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> >It's not much warning,
> I would have given more, if I could.
> >but it's just been revealed that the long promised upgrade of
> >sources.redhat.com will take place this coming Saturday at:
> >10am PST
> > 1pm EST
> > 6pm GMT
> > 7pm CET
> >and no doubt other timezones :-).
> >It will probably not return until Sunday morning. At a
> minimum it will be
> >three hours if everything goes well, but don't count on it.
> If it's not
> >up, it's not up.
> >All services will be off-line at that point: no cvs, web,
> ftp, or mailing
> >lists. We can't even hear you scream ;-).
> >It's definitely worth it as it will be a move to a much
> newer, faster and
> >larger machine.
> And one with a lot more net bandwidth, too. It's better in every way.
> Now, if *that* doesn't jinx me, nothing will.
> >That should make for a quiet weekend :).
> For some people, maybe. :-)
> Before posting, please read the FAQ:
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss