This is the mail archive of the ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] lwip officially in ecos?

From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
To: Jani Monoses <jani at iv dot ro>
Cc: ecos-maintainers at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:13:39 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFC] lwip officially in ecos?
References: <20030912121452.5c29331b.jani@iv.ro>

Jani Monoses wrote:

Hello all

I'd like to ask the maintainers' opinion on putting lwIP in ecos CVS.
I'm prepared to do all the legwork if the answer is positive.
lwIP is BSD-licensed and almost 'well-established' as the patch
submission doc requests. Although I intend to sign a copyright
assignment for other future contributions to ecos, IMO lwip is
unaffected because it is a separate BSD project but more importantly
because my contributions to it are minimal and quite a few people worked
on it (not as many as on the BSD stack or microwindows but still)

I'm all for it. I do agree it is well-established enough to waive the assignment for lwip itself. Of course changes to things outside of the lwIP package itself may be a different story.

Jifl
--
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] lwip officially in ecos?
  - From: Jani Monoses

References:
- [RFC] lwip officially in ecos?
  - From: Jani Monoses

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]