This is the mail archive of the ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 08:09, Gary Thomas wrote: > On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 07:58, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 07:11 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 10:07, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > Hi Folks > > > > > > > > Does anybody know how locking should work in the jffs2 package? > > > > > > > > To me this patch looks the wrong solution. > > > > > > I agree. I did already pass this to David, with no reply :-( > > > > Hmmm. I think the answer is to remove the one in jffs2_do_new_inode() > > instead. > > > > That function should rely on the OS-specific code to pass it a struct > > jffs2_inode_info which is initialised correctly, and that includes > > having a locked semaphore in it. > > > > I've committed the appropriate change to my CVS tree. > > Thanks, I'll merge this to the eCos repository. There are also some > changes in our tree (CDL stuff mostly) that need to be pushed your > way. I'll take care of that as well. Done (diffs attached). David, what magic do you use to run "syncmail" when you make CVS changes? -- Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> MLB Associates
Attachment:
diffs
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |