This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: fix for arm target.ld
>>>>> Andrew Lunn writes:
>> Ah now I see, gcc-3.x doesn't define "arm" (still using gcc-2.95 here).
> And gcc-2.95 is still the "supported" compiler for arm, not gcc 3.x.
> Does the section have to be called .note.arm.ident?
Can it have
> another name without arm in it?
We could probably use some preprocessor gymnastics to avoid the
problem. OTOH, anything wrong with Andrew's approach?