Re: OpenRISC eCos status

[Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>]

Robert Cragie wrote:
> At the moment, there are two distributions: That included in the
> sources.redhat.com version a that included in a separate snapshot on the
> OpenCores site. I assume the OpenRISC part of the code is most up to date in
> the OpenCores version but that the rest of the eCos source in the OpenCores
> version is lagging behind the sources.redhat.com version.

Correct.

> It would be very useful to get the sources.redhat.com version up to date.
> There seem to be some minor outstanding issues to be resolved - would it be
> possible to sort these out?

Of course ;). I'm working through my current backlog right now actually 
and should get back to that soon.

> If this can't be done soon, I will assume that
> the most suitable starting point is therefore the OpenCores version, i.e.
> there are no issues with that particular snapshot from an eCos point of
> view - am I right?

Not really no, do good ahead.

Jifl
--
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine