Re: Flash driver for SST39VF080 and SST39VF016

["Chris Garry" <cgarry at sweeneydesign dot co dot uk>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roland Caßebohm" <roland.cassebohm@visionsystems.de>
To: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: <ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: Flash driver for SST39VF080 and SST39VF016


> On Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2003 20:36, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 04:13:42PM +0200, Roland Ca?ebohm wrote:
> > > Attached is a flash driver for SST39VF080 and SST39VF016 cloned from the
> > > at29xxxx driver.
> >
> > A question about naming. We already have a 39vf400 driver. You have
> > named your new driver 39vfxxx and it support 080 and 016. Would it be
> > better to name it 39vf0xx? How generic is the driver? Could it in
> > theory support all of xxx, including the 400 or only 0xx?
> >
> >        Thanks
> >           Andrew
>
> I have attached an additional patch which includes support for
> 39vf400 taken values from the 39vf400 driver, but I can't test
> it because I haven't got hardware with a 39vf400 flash.
> But I think in theory it should work.
>
> Best regards,
> Roland
> -- 
>

I've tested this on an E7T with 39vf400 FLASH and it works fine.
When this patch is comitted I'll generate a patch to make the E7T
use the 39vfxxx driver instead of the old 39vf400 driver - then I
guess the old driver can be removed (I don't believe anything else
uses it...).

Regards,
Chris

--
Chris Garry
Sweeney Design Ltd