This is the mail archive of the ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: vnc and lwip

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>, Jani Monoses <jani at iv dot ro>,ecos-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 21:39:55 +0200
Subject: Re: vnc and lwip
References: <20040528183355.278fe4ba.jani@iv.ro> <20040528155257.GU32174@lunn.ch> <40B79024.9030300@eCosCentric.com>

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 08:16:52PM +0100, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:33:55PM +0300, Jani Monoses wrote:
> >
> >>Since lwip has a network.h header for compatibility with the other stacks
> >>this can be applied.Will do so if nobody objects.
> 
 
> Personally I dislike <network.h> when the new POSIX standard has a 
> standardised layout for the BSD sockets API. i.e. <sys/socket.h> etc.

network.h is not normal, but it does sort out the macro magic needed
to get the header files to compile correctly. I think thats why Gary
decided to invent it.

        Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: vnc and lwip
  - From: Gary Thomas

References:
- vnc and lwip
  - From: Jani Monoses
- Re: vnc and lwip
  - From: Andrew Lunn
- Re: vnc and lwip
  - From: Jonathan Larmour

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]