This is the mail archive of the ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: init_priority fix for services/memalloc


On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 00:03, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:53:01PM +0200, ?yvind Harboe wrote:
> > man, 27.09.2004 kl. 21.36 skrev Andrew Lunn:
> > > > > I would not shout compiler bug. Rather i would ask what the expected
> > > > > behavious is. Its a more tactfull approach.
> > > > 
> > > > It is not a compiler bug, it is the intended behaviour! :-)
> > > > 
> > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-08/msg00792.html
> > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14161
> > > 
> > > Does you fixed code still work OK with 3.2.1? 
> > 
> > I got around to testing it now w/GCC 3.2.1. Seems to compile and run
> > just fine.
> > 
> > So where do we go from here?
> 
> Good question. There is more than just the malloc stuff at issue
> here. Every single attribute needs checking and seeing if its
> complient with gcc 3.4.x. Also since gcc 3.4.x silently ignores ones
> it does not understand this is not going to be easy. 

If we can identify the precise problem, then perhaps we can write a grep
to weed out many of them.

> Add to that that
> 3.2.1 is the supported compiler which works fine....
> 
> We need inputs from the other maintainers.
> 
> 
>         Andrew
-- 
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]