This is the mail archive of the ecos-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: add cdl_option CYGDBG_KERNEL_INSTRUMENT_MLQ

From: John Dallaway <john at dallaway dot org dot uk>
To: Pieter-Jan Busschaert <pieterjan dot busschaert at gmail dot com>
Cc: ecos-patches at ecos dot sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:52:18 +0100
Subject: Re: add cdl_option CYGDBG_KERNEL_INSTRUMENT_MLQ
References: <950a36fb0909280912sd2eed50yb27f54957b1af37a@mail.gmail.com> <4AC46B09.5070809@dallaway.org.uk> <950a36fb0910010656q3da9aec8pd28c65c9ccad0042@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Pieter-Jan

Pieter-Jan Busschaert wrote:

> 2009/10/1 John Dallaway <john@dallaway.org.uk>:
>> Pieter-Jan Busschaert wrote:
>>
>>> In kernel\current\src\sched\mlqueue.cxx, several calls are made to
>>> CYG_INSTRUMENT_MLQ().
>> This seems perfectly reasonable. Is the resulting MLQ instrumentation
>> data sensible? If so, I will add the CDL option.
> 
> I am now analyzing this for the mutex3 test in the kernel (priority
> inheritance). At first sight the instrumentation data does look
> sensible. If I would see something odd, I will send a patch for that,
> but I don't expect that right now.

I've now added the CDL option.

Thank you for your report...

John Dallaway

References:
- Re: add cdl_option CYGDBG_KERNEL_INSTRUMENT_MLQ
  - From: John Dallaway
- Re: add cdl_option CYGDBG_KERNEL_INSTRUMENT_MLQ
  - From: Pieter-Jan Busschaert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]