This is the mail archive of the ecos-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
A few weeks ago, I posted a query about booleans on the ecos-discuss list (http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/2010-04/msg00035.html). There were no comments either way, so here's a patch. It should mean that all booleans end up using GCC's _Bool type, instead of a mix of _Bool and int. It showed up a couple of places where a function prototype didn't match the implementation, and this patch fixes them. Do others think that there was a problem with boolean definitions, and is this an appropriate fix? Alan Bowman
Attachment:
bool_patch_hg
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |