This is the mail archive of the
ecos-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
[Bug 1001125] New HAL for the Stellaris EK-LM3S811 board
- From: bugzilla-daemon at bugs dot ecos dot sourceware dot org
- To: ecos-patches at ecos dot sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:32:41 +0000
- Subject: [Bug 1001125] New HAL for the Stellaris EK-LM3S811 board
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-1001125-104@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>
Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001125
--- Comment #10 from Sergei Gavrikov <sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com> 2011-01-31 12:32:39 GMT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Created an attachment (id=1096)
--> (http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/attachment.cgi?id=1096) [details]
> > updated HAL
> >
> > If someone wants to play around with the tiny EK-LM3S811 kit.
Ilija Kocho wrote:
> Nice thing Christophe, Small is beautiful. This port may open door to
> a big number of devices as nearly every manufacturer has Cortex-M
> devices with 32KiB flash / 8KiB RAM (and below).
>
> [ To decision makers ]
>
> What about "lite" or "tiny" template?
> "minimal" + kernel + some memory tuning, (like in default_ROM.ecm)
AFAIK, it cannot be managed only with a template. I agreed that if n00b
cannot compile "hello, world!" via diag_printf() using minimal template,
it is our pain (that is famous 32K stack size issue), also I have doubts
about ~1/2 eCos kernel tests which use stacks like STACK_SIZE_TYPICAL x
N. Ilija, it does not seem to me that all decision makers and experts on
CC list of the Bug 1001125, so, I would raise the discussion on the same
subject on ecos-devel list.
Sergei
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.