This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug 1001186] Introduce Cortex-M4 to the Cortex-M architecture

Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:

--- Comment #4 from Sergei Gavrikov <> 2011-04-06 16:42:30 BST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The M4 stuff looks OK to me.
> However, I am not sure that we need the M0 option. 


> Adding M0 to the list would raise entirely false expectations that this
> processor type was supported. In fact, I would prefer to remove M1, since
> these parts have the same problems.
> We would have to do quite a lot of work to support M0/1. Given that these
> parts are targeted at very low resource systems, I doubt that there will
> ever be much demand for eCos on these.

Nick, thank you for your expert look and explanation. So then, should I
reject the M0 (and M1?) mentions from the cortexm config file?

Ilija, do you have M0-claim for your present ports? If you have not,
I'll fix the patch too.

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]