Re: make[5]: execvp: C:/Cygwin/bin/bash.exe: No more processes

["Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>]

<snip>

> I'm about to get the latest snapshot code to try stefans experimental
ioctl
> patch.

I may have causewd confusion with my I-just-woke-up language. I am going to
roll-my-own cygwin1.dll bsaed on the snapshort and stefans patch.

> To the woodcutter song:
> "I'm a guinea pig an I'm ok,
                              and
> I test code and aI crash all day...."
                            I

Doh!
>
> Rob
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Faylor" <cgf@cygnus.com>
> To: <cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
> Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 3:38 AM
> Subject: Re: make[5]: execvp: C:/Cygwin/bin/bash.exe: No more processes
>
>
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:21:39PM +0200, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote:
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Chris Faylor [mailto:cgf@cygnus.com]
> > >> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 2:47 AM
> > >> To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
> > >> Subject: Re: make[5]: execvp: C:/Cygwin/bin/bash.exe: No more
> > >> processes
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 08:40:10PM -0400, Guy T. Moore Jr. wrote:
> > >> >Cygwin'ers:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >I've somewhat narrowed down a make error based on the level
> > >> >of nested makes but using our build system the way it is.
> > >> >i.e.: I cannot prove that my error is only related to the
> > >> >      number of nested makes.
> > >> >
> > >> >So I guess this is stack related or some other resource that
> > >> >I would like to bump up.
> > >> >
> > >> >What resource is my error related to, and can I bump it up
> > >> >using what command?
> > >>
> > >> Since the only message you're getting is "no more processes", I
> > >> would guess that it may be accurate.  How about adding a 'ps -ef'
> > >> to each recursion, to verify.
> > >>
> > >> cygwin 1.1.4 only allows a limited number of processes.  I've removed
> > >> this limitation in the snapshots.  Now you can have as many processes
> > >> as Windows allows.
> > >
> > >Sorry, this is the answer to my preceding e-mail... should have read th
> > >ewhole thread (my own excuse is that outlook had split the thread for
> some
> > >mysterious reason...)
> > >
> > >>
> > >> So, two things:  1) try adding the 'ps', and 2) try a snapshot.
> > >>
> > >
> > >Thanks; however I'll probably wait for the next cygwin release :-)
> >
> > That's a shame.  It's likely that there will be problems in the next
> release
> > if no one tests the snapshots.
> >
> > cgf
> >
> > --
> > Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
>
>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com