This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: RedBoot + Configuration tool 2.11 question
- From: "Gregg C Levine" <hansolofalcon at worldnet dot att dot net>
- To: "'Jonathan Larmour'" <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
- Cc: "'eCos Discussion'" <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:38:27 -0400
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] RedBoot + Configuration tool 2.11 question
Hello again from Gregg C Levine
Okay. That's what I missed. Thanks.
-------------------
Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon@worldnet.att.net
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke."? Obi-Wan Kenobi
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Larmour [mailto:jifl@eCosCentric.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:36 PM
> To: Gregg C Levine
> Cc: 'eCos Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] RedBoot + Configuration tool 2.11 question
>
> I had written:
> >>
> >>[ Note HTML is normally rejected by the ecos-discuss list as it
is a
> >>reasonably good indicator of spam in general, as well as being
> >>incompatible with many mail readers ]
> Gregg C Levine wrote:
> > Not really relevant to the subject, but its attached to the
> > declaration. Jonathan, I missed the meaning behind that blurb in
the
> > square brackets. What are you referring to?
>
> It means that in an attempt to reduce spam that passes through this
list
> we take various approaches to reduce it. You'll notice that very
little
> spam passes through the list. One of the reasons is measures like
this
> where all HTML mail is filtered (at least, last I looked it was).
>
> This may affect a few posters initially, but most MUAs can be set up
to
> post in plaintext to individual addresses, although to be honest
it's more
> sociable to default to text anyway unless you know the recipient
uses an
> HTML capable mailer. And that's another incidental benefit of this:
that
> users not wishing to use HTML mailers don't get disenfranchised.
>
> I can't imagine any reason why HTML would improve things on the eCos
list.
>
> Jifl
> --
> eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot
experts
> --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
> --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]--
Opinions==mine
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss