This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hello,This is already fixed in CVS.
if I call CYGACC_CALL_IF_DELAY_US(1000000) in order to delay one second, then this call returns a lot faster then 1 second. When I debug the code, then I can see, that HAL_DELAY_US provided by the HAL is only used if no kernel package is included. HAL_DELAY_US(1000000) works fine.
If the kernel package is included, the the following calculation takes place:
// How many ticks total we should wait for.
usec_ticks = usecs*CYGNUM_KERNEL_COUNTERS_RTC_PERIOD;
There are better ways to wait for 1 second if you are using the kernel - CYGACC_CALL_IF_DELAY_US is a busy wait.
-- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |