This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: Will gcc3.3 will work with eCos?.
- From: "Sanjiv Gupta" <skg at cradle dot com>
- To: "Satish Kumar" <satishkumar at sanyo dot co dot in>
- Cc: "'radhakrishnan R'" <radhaamanji at yahoo dot co dot uk>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>, <gary at mlbassoc dot com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:18:45 +0530
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] Will gcc3.3 will work with eCos?.
Well, please refer to test results at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/buildstat.html
Though, I am not aware of any real application
working with GCC 3.3.x, but it can compile itself.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Satish Kumar [mailto:satishkumar@sanyo.co.in]
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:59 AM
> To: 'radhakrishnan R'; ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> Cc: skg@cradle.com; gary@mlbassoc.com
> Subject: RE: [ECOS] Will gcc3.3 will work with eCos?.
>
>
> well, i have found gcc 3.2.1 to be stable with ecos v 2.0.
> yes, gcc 3.3 does have some problems while compiling any application.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radhakrishnan R [mailto:radhaamanji@yahoo.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:32 AM
> To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> Cc: skg@cradle.com; gary@mlbassoc.com
> Subject: [ECOS] Will gcc3.3 will work with eCos?.
>
>
> Iam presently trying to use the gcc3.3 with eCos.
>
> Have any one have tried to use gcc3.3 with the latest
> eCos??.
>
> I have also read in the mailing list, that
> "-finit-priority" is not available in gcc3.3. I hope
> this will result global constructor calling sequence
> to go wrong.
>
> Is there any workaround for this?.
> What is the recommented gnu tools to work for
> eCos1.3.1/eCos2.0 ?.
>
> After building eCos program i.e any sample with
> gcc3.3, i have observed the following behaviour in the
> eCos startup program.
>
> i) There is a call to cyg_hal_invoke_constructors
> from Vectors.S.
> ii) This is the Global constructors call. The first
> constructor function called is Cyg_StdioStream()
> available in stdout.cxx.
> iii) This function fails(i.e Trying to find a file
> in mountable, not available...), hence the eCos halts
> on file error.
>
> Is this constructor "Cyg_StdioStream()" is a
> expected one?.
>
> It looks like constructors function call in eCos is
> getting changed with new tools. The reason for this is
> due to removal of compiler flag "-finit-priority",
> which is responsible for ordering the constructor
> call??.
>
> Regards,
> Radhakrishnan R
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
> your friends today! Download Messenger Now
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
>
> --
> Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
> and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss