This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean

To: Isamu Hasegawa <isamu at yamato dot ibm dot com>
Subject: Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 06 Feb 2001 22:24:33 -0800
Cc: hjl at valinux dot com, libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <m33ddrtkvc.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com><20010207.095453.78212554.isamu@yamato.ibm.com><m3y9vjs3fc.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com><20010207.113812.42414901.isamu@yamato.ibm.com>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

Isamu Hasegawa <isamu@yamato.ibm.com> writes:

> How about the following patch?

Looks fine on first sight.  I'll try it out.

> However I fear that my assumption might be incorrect.
> I think the index of the _NL_COLLATE_SYMB_EXTRAMB table is
> not more than wchar_t.  Is this assumption true?

This is valid.  Wchar_t must have 32 bits which definitely is enough
for the index.

Thanks,

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

References:
- Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean
  - From: Isamu Hasegawa
- Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean
  - From: Isamu Hasegawa

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]