This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean

To: Isamu Hasegawa <isamu at yamato dot ibm dot com>
Subject: Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:21:40 -0800
Cc: drepper at cygnus dot com, shoji at jp dot ibm dot com,libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20010207.213118.98159109.isamu@yamato.ibm.com> <20010207145404.A5574@valinux.com> <20010208.100634.01366180.isamu@yamato.ibm.com> <20010208.144308.60853393.isamu@yamato.ibm.com>

On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:43:08PM +0900, Isamu Hasegawa wrote:
> "H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> wrote:
> > It is still not 64bit clean. I got
> 
> I'm sorry I have given you so much trouble.

It is ok.

> How about the following patch, which is against rev.1.88 ?
> (I'm afraid whether this ad-hoc patch is acceptable or not.)
> 

It is even worse. Now posix/runtests crashed:

...
#165: OK.
Illegal instruction


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean
  - From: Isamu Hasegawa

References:
- Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean
  - From: Isamu Hasegawa
- Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean
  - From: Isamu Hasegawa
- Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean
  - From: Isamu Hasegawa

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]