RE: [glibc-HEAD (2.3.3)] - Problem with NPTL and Bind 9.2.3

["Shawn Starr" <shawn dot starr at rogers dot com>]

Ok, I've attached the binary, It may or may not work for you, BIND itself
was statically built, but the test binary is linked against my glibc and
NTPL pthreads libraries:

        linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xffffe000)
        libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4001d000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x40032000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40042000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

This may be ok though, It was compiled with gcc 3.3.3 prerelease, and hjl's
latest binutils 2.14.90.0.7 

Shawn.

You do not need root to run it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de] 
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 02:13 PM
To: Shawn Starr
Cc: libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [glibc-HEAD (2.3.3)] - Problem with NPTL and Bind 9.2.3


"Shawn Starr" <shawn.starr@rogers.com> writes:

> When attempting to use threads with BIND 9.2.3, bind quits with a 
> fatal error. Recompiling BIND 9.2.3 w/o threads works.
>
> When running make check for bind, the failures occur on tasks:

This does not help, we cannot debug such programs.  Please provide a small,
self-contained test program if you're convinced there's a bug in glibc.

> There seems to be problems with heap and NPTL ? Others have told me 
> NPTL in

Not that I'm aware off.

> RedHat's glibc works fine. However, I am using my own Pure-LFS and 
> this fails for me.
>
> I will update my libc sources today just incase any issues have been 
> resolved between today and 3 days ago.

Nothing has changed in that area,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: t_tasks
Description: Binary data