This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: inotify support.

From: Robert Love <rlove at rlove dot org>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:34:59 -0400
Subject: Re: inotify support.
References: <1123600124.18388.2.camel@betsy> <42FC126E.2010800@redhat.com> <1123816415.13401.28.camel@phantasy> <42FC1F03.2080001@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 21:01 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> It is usually better to explicitly size bitmask (i.e., pass a pointer
> and a lenght) unless there is really no reasonable outcome in which more
> than, in this case, 32 bits are used.

I really don't think there is.  We are fine.

	Robert Love

References:
- inotify support.
  - From: Robert Love
- Re: inotify support.
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: inotify support.
  - From: Robert Love
- Re: inotify support.
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]