This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Don't document the types of standard typedefs

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:33:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Don't document the types of standard typedefs
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1202270030480.30479@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><CADZpyixZCznkhsov0szPNZTntnPn9JDh80wwjjXy1Yj8sfU0zA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

> I don't understand your meaning about a lack of a 64-bit port for GNU
> Hurd being the reason behind these descriptions? Could you explain
> that in more detail?

Various of these types differ for GNU/Linux between 32-bit and 64-bit 
architectures - so the only reason that they are constant on all GNU/Hurd 
systems is likely that the only vaguely functional GNU/Hurd port is to 
32-bit x86.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- Don't document the types of standard typedefs
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Don't document the types of standard typedefs
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]