This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t (was: GNU C Library master sources branch, master, updated. glibc-2.15-229-g4efeffc)

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>,Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,drepper at gmail dot com
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:23:15 -0400
Subject: Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t (was: GNU C Library master sources branch, master, updated. glibc-2.15-229-g4efeffc)
References: <20120226181752.1175.qmail@sourceware.org> <87zkbhkipp.fsf@schwinge.name> <CADZpyiwXDJSPRDoQpA3ZOTYsznMc_2DrVpr3z0y-zt2z5FjkRQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday 15 March 2012 11:57:00 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> We should be rebuilding *all* of userspace when glibc changes. It
> would be nice if we setup an OpenEmbedded system to rebuild as much of
> x86-64 userspace as possible against a new glibc and check for
> regressions.

emerge -e world
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

References:
- struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t (was: GNU C Library master sources branch, master, updated. glibc-2.15-229-g4efeffc)
  - From: Thomas Schwinge
- Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t (was: GNU C Library master sourcesbranch, master, updated. glibc-2.15-229-g4efeffc)
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]