This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu dot lu at intel dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
References: <20120315192515.GA6585@intel.com><20120315195000.7E3BE2C0A3@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOpXRcO6a4cFEU=s1Gjzzt87zvyzuLhAWupc2pOX6az6ig@mail.gmail.com><20120315232954.52CB42C0BB@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOot6kFbuGWUXapVmaLO31TAuw39uvQ=D0Jj=aW3o1ve1g@mail.gmail.com>

It wasn't entirely clear to me that we'd resolved the question of tv_nsec
ever not being 'long int'.  But this change itself doesn't ever define
__snseconds_t to anything but that, so it is not a problem so far.


Thanks,
Roland

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]