This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Define libgcc soname in make scripts and not in a header

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Define libgcc soname in make scripts and not in a header
References: <20120406191422.7e4e08c9@spoyarek><Pine.LNX.4.64.1204061548170.23195@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><20120409225148.5c0f105e@spoyarek><CADZpyiwuW0LRmy+3VpFj+1MBv1odOAeu+idfw4BtgCAiLVnAbQ@mail.gmail.com><20120412163013.0F4062C075@topped-with-meat.com><CADZpyizkzDd6EkgHAq4Ou9+dbJCNXT1LP4vgm3xrKuXVVBFC3A@mail.gmail.com>

> Given that I'm inclined to say the way forward is probably:
> 
> * Stick with manual control.
> 
> * Move libgcc-so-name to shlib-versions.
> 
> * Add some configure sanity checks to ensure runtime matches expectations?

Sounds fine to me.

References:
- [PATCH 2/3] Define libgcc soname in make scripts and not in aheader
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] Define libgcc soname in make scripts and not in aheader
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] Define libgcc soname in make scripts and not in aheader
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] Define libgcc soname in make scripts and not in a header
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] Define libgcc soname in make scripts and not in a header
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] Define libgcc soname in make scripts and not in a header
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]