This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Bump up stdio bug22 timeout from 30 seconds to 60seconds

From: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
To: carlos at systemhalted dot org
Cc: cmetcalf at tilera dot com, ryan dot arnold at gmail dot com, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:38:05 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bump up stdio bug22 timeout from 30 seconds to 60seconds
References: <CADZpyiyz7mDjfFpnwoypaTzbpRG6k2asD91Qf_UDMMEP=1z5Yw@mail.gmail.com><20120517.160510.1252108281376579545.davem@davemloft.net><CADZpyizLNzhpRRQ_EYu4KpmyQEOv120JZUtkr_b1mqozCocxvw@mail.gmail.com>

From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:29:19 -0400

> I'm fine with this. Generally 30-60 seconds is reasonable for a small
> test timeout, at least given the number of glibc tests.
> 
> Anyone who says the purpose of these timeouts is to catch performance
> regressions is dreaming in technicolor.

:-)  Great, committed to master.

Thanks.

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Bump up stdio bug22 timeout from 30 seconds to 60 seconds
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] Bump up stdio bug22 timeout from 30 seconds to 60seconds
  - From: David Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Bump up stdio bug22 timeout from 30 seconds to 60 seconds
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]