This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
> you miss the colon, it's "* file: New file." etc.
Fixed.
ChangeLog:
2012-08-15 Liubov Dmitrieva <liubov.dmitrieva@gmail.com>
* sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_sinf.S: New file.
* sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_cosf.S: New file.
* sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/libm-test-ulps: Update.
> Please remove the Contributed line, we're not adding this anymore.
Fixed and reattached.
> I do have a question to the
> other glibc reviewers on the style of the comments - is that one
> really ok or should we enforce the usual one?
Nobody answered means comments are fine I guess.
Thanks for the review.
--
Liubov Dmitrieva
Intel Corporation
2012/8/13 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com>:
> On 08/13/2012 04:06 PM, Dmitrieva Liubov wrote:
>>
>> I've fixed the sinf and cosf x86_64 patch according to requests below
>> and reattach it.
>>
>> And yes, I intend to provide SSE optimized sincos in couple weeks for
>> the patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-06/msg00692.html
>
>
> thanks.
>
>
>> Change log is the same:
>>
>> 2012-08-13 Liubov Dmitrieva <liubov.dmitrieva@gmail.com>
>>
>> * sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_sinf.S New file.
>> * sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_cosf.S New file.
>> * sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/libm-test-ulps Update.
>
>
> you miss the colon, it's "* file: New file." etc.
>
>> [...]
>> diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_cosf.S b/sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_cosf.S
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 0000000..e9fa5a6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_cosf.S
>> @@ -0,0 +1,523 @@
>> +/* Optimized cosf function.
>> + Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> + Contributed by Intel Corporation.
>
>
> Please remove the Contributed line, we're not adding this anymore.
>
> Thanks a lot for the detailed comments! I do have a question to the
> other glibc reviewers on the style of the comments - is that one
> really ok or should we enforce the usual one?
>
>
> Andreas
> --
> Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
> GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
sinf_cosf_x86_64.patch
Description: Binary data
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |