This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][BZ #1349] Return requested size for malloc_usable_sizewhen MALLOC_CHECK_ > 0

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:02:39 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BZ #1349] Return requested size for malloc_usable_sizewhen MALLOC_CHECK_ > 0
References: <20120831113205.2a75668a@spoyarek> <5040B03E.2070903@suse.com> <20120831183207.79c2b4fd@spoyarek> <5040B881.403@redhat.com> <20120831190244.1beb0dd4@spoyarek>

On 08/31/2012 03:32 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:

so this does not depend on granularity. You have perhaps confused this
with the general case, where malloc_usable_size does depend on
granularity, not in case of MALLOC_CHECK_, where it shouldn't?

Indeed, thanks for the clarification.

--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team

References:
- [PATCH][BZ #1349] Return requested size for malloc_usable_size whenMALLOC_CHECK_ > 0
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH][BZ #1349] Return requested size for malloc_usable_sizewhen MALLOC_CHECK_ > 0
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [PATCH][BZ #1349] Return requested size for malloc_usable_sizewhen MALLOC_CHECK_ > 0
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH][BZ #1349] Return requested size for malloc_usable_sizewhen MALLOC_CHECK_ > 0
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH][BZ #1349] Return requested size for malloc_usable_sizewhen MALLOC_CHECK_ > 0
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]