This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use -mnew-mnemonics

From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>,<libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Ryan Arnold <rsa at us dot ibm dot com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:18:29 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use -mnew-mnemonics
References: <a0e2c35c983565b8dc1b64e950ef02538ec8cc34.1347631515.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> <50533FDC.2080301@mentor.com> <m2627g3bfi.fsf@igel.home>

On 9/14/2012 10:51 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell@mentor.com> writes:
> 
>> Won't the older GCC's we support still need this flag?
> 
> -mnew-mnemonics has always been the default for PowerPC.

If that's the case then I'm OK with removing it, but the Power 
maintainer should verify that behaviour and ACK the patch.

If you have to go out of your way to use -mno-new-mnemonics
in your CFLAGS to break the glibc build then that's your own
fault. If it works with gcc out-of-the-box then I'm happy.

Ryan?

Cheers,
Carlos.
-- 
Carlos O'Donell
Mentor Graphics / CodeSourcery
carlos_odonell@mentor.com
carlos@codesourcery.com
+1 (613) 963 1026

References:
- [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use -mnew-mnemonics
  - From: Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use -mnew-mnemonics
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use -mnew-mnemonics
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]