This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Wednesday 24 October 2012 13:12:35 Roland McGrath wrote:
> > # For the multi-arch option we need support in the assembler.
> > AC_CACHE_CHECK([for assembler gnu_indirect_function symbol type
> > support],
> >
> > - libc_cv_asm_gnu_indirect_function, [dnl
> > + libc_cv_ld_gnu_indirect_function, [dnl
>
> You forgot to change the message (and the comment):
i thought you were referring to the commit message before. oh well, v4 will
be up shortly.
> > + # Do a link to see if the backend supports IFUNC relocs.
> > + $READELF -r conftest 1>&AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD
> > + LC_ALL=C $READELF -r conftest | grep 'no relocations' >/dev/null || {
> > + libc_cv_ld_gnu_indirect_function=yes
> > + }
>
> This is subject to false-negatives if there is some unexpected weirdness
> with readelf or something. But I'm not too concerned.
yeah, that's why i sent the full readelf output to the log to make it easy to
diagnose in the future. i checked x86_64/arm/ia64 to make sure it was OK.
-mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |