Re: If glibc had a logo what would it be?

[Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>]

On 12/08/2012 09:04 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org> wrote:
> > If glibc had a logo what would it be?
>
> Honestly, I think that it would be better to spend time on integrating
> strlcpy() and strlcat() so that a billion programs don't have to carry
> stubs for them anymore due to GNU arrogance than making a logo.
>
> I also generally don't see the point in having a logo for a C library;
> logos make sense for GUI apps, which a C library is not.

For me, it's a question of identity - and of having fun working 
together. A logo might help growing the community and that would help 
all of us.

Btw. GCC and the Linux kernel have logos - and they are not GUI apps ;)

Andreas
--
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126