This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][BZ #16996] get_nprocs: Only return explictly set cache values

From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
Cc: Meador Inge <meadori at codesourcery dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 02:24:13 +0530
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BZ #16996] get_nprocs: Only return explictly set cache values
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <1402591036-29454-1-git-send-email-meadori at codesourcery dot com> <20140612171519 dot GN10378 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <539A0BF4 dot 6000603 at codesourcery dot com> <20140612203737 dot 763EC2C39B8 at topped-with-meat dot com>

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:37:37PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> time_t is always an integer type counting seconds since 1970 in glibc.
> However, it can be signed and negative values can be valid timestamps (if
> you set your computer's clock to 1969, for example).

Oh yes, so:

    (now == prev && now != 0)

Siddhesh

Attachment: pgpsPuF6zc6lz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][BZ #16996] get_nprocs: Only return explictly set cache values
  - From: Meador Inge

References:
- [PATCH][BZ #16996] get_nprocs: Only return explictly set cache values
  - From: Meador Inge
- Re: [PATCH][BZ #16996] get_nprocs: Only return explictly set cache values
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH][BZ #16996] get_nprocs: Only return explictly set cache values
  - From: Meador Inge
- Re: [PATCH][BZ #16996] get_nprocs: Only return explictly set cache values
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]