This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Seeking consensus on BZ 16734
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- To: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>
- Cc: Rich Felker <dalias at libc dot org>, Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, GLIBC Devel <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Daniel Colascione <dancol at dancol dot org>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:31:47 +0100
- Subject: Re: Seeking consensus on BZ 16734
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CALoOobP_7jpdZUqSFmKCTFds6t8TTdnxfOfg2jCTr_TjvU+t2w at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOrp6jCuPe4ZX-kdHdO_4_k-Dpf7ha-PxtCJmJLnL3K0-A at mail dot gmail dot com> <CALoOobMZFx7c+i0GCFRg1-1Z=2H3xDDH8+td-D=0k9muAFvPAA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150202051410 dot GG23507 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <54DB5A67 dot 309 at redhat dot com> <20150211140240 dot GW23507 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <54DB62C6 dot 4070409 at redhat dot com> <20150211142553 dot GA25334 at domone>
On 02/11/2015 03:25 PM, OndÅej BÃlka wrote:
> Can we move with original patch?
I think avoiding mmap is fine, but the ALLOC_BUF/ALLOC_WBUF/FREE_BUF
macros should be removed completely. It is better to expand them, to
make the control flow explicit.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security