Re: Clean up state on patchwork

["Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>]

On 09/17/2015 07:09 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> I've done some partial cleanup of state for submitters with only a few 
> patches there (to mark committed or superseded patches as such, mainly, 
> although I did mark some others as Changes Requested and a few other 
> states, e.g. Not Applicable for patches to other projects such as the 
> Linux kernel).

Thanks.

> I haven't yet gone through entries for submitters with names starting with 
> letters M to T (perhaps someone else would like to pick up an alphabetical 
> range to clean up state for submitters in that range with not too many 
> patches each?).  And the following submitters have especially large 
> numbers of patches in patchwork so I haven't attempted to go through their 
> patches at all; it's especially desirable for such submitters to take 
> responsibility for removing obsolete patchwork entries for patches they 
> submitted (marking as Committed or Superseded as applicable, or other 
> states if appropriate), and for pinging patches pending review.
> 
> Adhemerval Zanella Netto
> Alexandre Oliva
> Andreas Schwab
> Andrew Pinski
> Carlos O'Donell

Cleaned up.

> Florian Weimer
> H.J. Lu
> Ondrej Bilka
> Paul Pluzhnikov
> Stefan Liebler
> Torvald Riegel
> Wilco Dijkstra

> (It's entirely possible some of those people have already been keeping 
> their patchwork state clean and simply have a lot of patches pending 
> review.  And a fair number of the patches are for AArch64 ILP32, so maybe 
> effectively on hold until the kernel port is in and the kernel/userspace 
> ABI confirmed.)

I agree we need more review of smaller patches.

Thanks go out to Mike Frysinger who has been doing a lot of that lately.

Cheers,
Carlos.