This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: [PATCH] Fixed family and model detection for AMD CPU's

From: "Pawar, Amit" <Amit dot Pawar at amd dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, "libc-alpha at sourceware dot org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:17:23 +0000
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fixed family and model detection for AMD CPU's
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp dot mailfrom=Amit dot Pawar at amd dot com;
References: <SN1PR12MB0733CCE45E6F9B965769E21E97290 at SN1PR12MB0733 dot namprd12 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <563B276D dot 4010403 at redhat dot com> <SN1PR12MB07330D19C8A7EE7224462F2E97290 at SN1PR12MB0733 dot namprd12 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1511051246260 dot 4094 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <SN1PR12MB0733D57468171C5370FEA01297060 at SN1PR12MB0733 dot namprd12 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <CAMe9rOocLpTK8aevo7j-Xf5zqgVRN9Fd7bn6NW980aqo7yLQdQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23

Changes are done as per the suggestion. Can you or someone please apply this attached patch on behalf of me?

Thanks,
Amit Pawar

-----Original Message-----
From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.tools@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 6:53 PM
To: Pawar, Amit
Cc: Joseph Myers; Florian Weimer; libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed family and model detection for AMD CPU's

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Pawar, Amit <Amit.Pawar@amd.com> wrote:
> Please find the attached recreated patch to this mail. Bugzilla ID included in Glibc Changelog and git commit log.
>
> Problem: In GLIBC Family and model values detection are incorrect.
> Why this fix?
> Based on arch ISA flags string and memory routines are selected. In 
> future patches, will be defining ISA flags based on family and model values which will help in selecting the correct string or memory routines.
>
> Is it OK to apply?
>

Try this one instead.

--
H.J.

Attachment: 0001-BZ-19214-Fix-for-family-and-model-detection-for-AMD-.patch
Description: 0001-BZ-19214-Fix-for-family-and-model-detection-for-AMD-.patch

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fixed family and model detection for AMD CPU's
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- [PATCH] Fixed family and model detection for AMD CPU's
  - From: Pawar, Amit
- Re: [PATCH] Fixed family and model detection for AMD CPU's
  - From: Florian Weimer
- RE: [PATCH] Fixed family and model detection for AMD CPU's
  - From: Pawar, Amit
- RE: [PATCH] Fixed family and model detection for AMD CPU's
  - From: Joseph Myers
- RE: [PATCH] Fixed family and model detection for AMD CPU's
  - From: Pawar, Amit
- Re: [PATCH] Fixed family and model detection for AMD CPU's
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]