Re: [PATCH v2] intl: reintroduce unintentionally disabled optimization

["Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv at altlinux dot org>]

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 02:09:48PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Dmitry V. Levin writes:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 01:51:02PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> 
> >> > We certainly do have some macros defined directly in this file:
> >> > $ grep '#define' config.h.in
> >> > #define HAVE_IFUNC 0
> >> > #define	HAVE_STRERROR	1
> >> > #define HAVE_REGEX 1
> >> > #define ARM_PCREL_MOVW_OK 0
> >> > #define HAVE_PT_CHOWN 0
> >> > #define HAVE_BUILTIN_TRAP 0
> >> > #define HAVE_PPC_FCFID 0
> >> > #define HAVE_PPC_FCTIDZ 0
> >> 
> >> Most of these (those defined to 0) are the templates used by AC_DEFINE.
> >
> > OK, so what's the preferred way of adding new macros
> > like HAVE_BUILTIN_EXPECT and HAVE_REGEX?  
> 
> For case like HAVE_BUILTIN_EXPECT there is not much point in using
> AC_DEFINE.

Is PATCH v2 OK then?


-- 
ldv

Attachment: pgp2Y3Uf6Cm_K.pgp
Description: PGP signature