This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Reduce number of mmap calls from __libc_memalign in ld.so

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:42:05 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce number of mmap calls from __libc_memalign in ld.so
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20160402153421 dot GA28788 at intel dot com> <20160402173308 dot GU6588 at vapier dot lan> <CAMe9rOq8ZsUUKJRuuwL0hvHtjm1Swx1x5H_GjbzR54HU+VzK9g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOoD2MjeFks+869r7v8S5S07eArBh3p57MBmYxbV7HK6UQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <m2zitb2nbd dot fsf at linux-m68k dot org>

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> +      if (__glibc_unlikely (nup == 0 && n))
>
> Please also fix the implicit boolean coercion.
>
> Andreas.
>

Like this?  OK for master?

-- 
H.J.

Attachment: 0001-Reduce-number-of-mmap-calls-from-__libc_memalign-in-.patch
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Reduce number of mmap calls from __libc_memalign in ld.so
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- [PATCH] Reduce number of mmap calls from __libc_memalign in ld.so
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] Reduce number of mmap calls from __libc_memalign in ld.so
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: [PATCH] Reduce number of mmap calls from __libc_memalign in ld.so
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] Reduce number of mmap calls from __libc_memalign in ld.so
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] Reduce number of mmap calls from __libc_memalign in ld.so
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]