This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 04/12/2016 08:01 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
I don't dispute those notions as likely realities in many situations. I just dispute the notion that they are universal absolutes that mean the middle way is clearly useless to everyone and can be disregarded out of hand.
Absolutely true in general. Based on available data, I just don't think staged deprecation is the best approach for dealing with union wait.
Another oddity: Portable software already has a check for the availability of union wait. A deprecated union wait type will still pass the configure test, and cause deprecation warnings (possibly treated as errors) later in the build. Direct removal does not.
Florian
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |