This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Do we care about malloc failure in tests?

From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>, GLIBC Devel <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Bill Parker <wp02855 at gmail dot com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:39:04 -0700
Subject: Re: Do we care about malloc failure in tests?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CALoOobNcJ6MaE3OfhY2KebXa=Z8kzhsgKpoesbzvvhUEEZhz=A at mail dot gmail dot com> <20160531220247 dot GC7717 at vapier dot lan>

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> i'd really like to see xmalloc type helpers added to the test skeleton
> rather than change every test to include the same boiler plate

How does attached patch look?

If it's ok, I can commit it and then convert malloc/calloc/realloc in
tests to xmalloc and friends.

Thanks,

2016-06-05  Paul Pluzhnikov  <ppluzhnikov@google.com>

        * test-skeleton.c (oom_error, xmalloc, xcalloc, xrealloc): New
functions.
        (add_temp_file): Use them.

-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov

Attachment: glibc-xmalloc-test-20160605.txt
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do we care about malloc failure in tests?
  - From: Mike Frysinger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]