This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Replace MUTEX_INITIALIZER with _LIBC_LOCK_INITIALIZER in generic code

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 19:19:58 +0200
Subject: Re: Replace MUTEX_INITIALIZER with _LIBC_LOCK_INITIALIZER in generic code
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20160820143610.GA14327@var> <20160820144801.GC1620@var.home>

On 08/20/2016 04:48 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:

+	* malloc/malloc.c (main_arena): Use MUTEX_INITIALIZER instead of
+	_LIBC_LOCK_INITIALIZER.

No, you need to define _LIBC_LOCK_INITIALIZER in terms ofMUTEX_INITIALIZER. If this is not possible, you need to select a lockwhich is compatible with the libc_lock infrastructure for the malloc mutex.


Florian

References:
- Re: Replace MUTEX_INITIALIZER with _LIBC_LOCK_INITIALIZER in generic code
  - From: Samuel Thibault
- Re: Replace MUTEX_INITIALIZER with _LIBC_LOCK_INITIALIZER in generic code
  - From: Samuel Thibault

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]