This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 0/4] explicit_bzero, this time for sure

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 11:34:19 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] explicit_bzero, this time for sure
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <cover.1471452663.git.zackw@panix.com> <CAKCAbMg7vvAR0LFU3Yv6EYK-fHYkOdK=n1KzkVu5H_hFrPzA7g@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/06/2016 07:11 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote:

Now that we're in full swing on 2.25 (and I'm not trying to hit a
conference deadline), here is an updated version of the explicit_bzero
patchset.


Ping.

I think the consensus evolved that we want an explict_bzero and__explicit_bzero_chk in libc, not just the inline wrapper.


Thanks,
Florian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] explicit_bzero, this time for sure
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] explicit_bzero, this time for sure
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]