This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Charset request for iconv (patch included)

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
To: dcoffin at shell dot cybercom dot net
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 14:00:58 +0200
Subject: Re: Charset request for iconv (patch included)
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20161001034427.GA26656@shell.cybercom.net> <87mvinst1t.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20161002052837.GA27209@shell.cybercom.net> <m2wphrkwvp.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <877f9rp4dz.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20161003032441.GA29670@shell.cybercom.net>

On 10/03/2016 05:24 AM, dcoffin@shell.cybercom.net wrote:

     OK then, let's use the math-sigma.  Can the
Unicode-->HP-48 conversion be set to accept either?

     I still don't fully understand why Unicode has
accented letters when zero-width combining marks are
available.

I believe such code points exist if there is a legacy character set thathave a matching code point.

Anyway, I'm not convinced that this charset is in active use to a degreethat it would merit inclusion in glibc.


Florian

References:
- Charset request for iconv (patch included)
  - From: dcoffin
- Re: Charset request for iconv (patch included)
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Charset request for iconv (patch included)
  - From: dcoffin
- Re: Charset request for iconv (patch included)
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: Charset request for iconv (patch included)
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Charset request for iconv (patch included)
  - From: dcoffin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]