This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 3/6] Implement the %OB specifier - alternative month names (bug 10871)


On 03/29/2016 11:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 03/25/2016 01:55 AM, Rafal Luzynski wrote:

strftime() now implements a %OB format specifier which generates an
alternative month name.  For the languages which require both nominative
and genitive case of the month names it is expected that it outputs
the alternative month name which should be a nominative (sic!) case
or whatever is appropriate when formatting the month names standalone
(without a day).  For those languages %B will return the basic month
name but from now it is expected to be a genitive case or whatever is
appropriate when formatting full dates (including both day and month).
This means that all applications using %B to retrieve the month
name standalone should use %OB from now.  For those languages which
do not use different (nominative and genitive) cases of the month
name or do not yet have their locales updated %OB will retrieve
the same string as %B so moving to %OB will be harmless as long
as the version of glibc which supports this feature is used.

What's the status here on the POSIX side?  It's marked as Accepted in
the tracker, but the changes apparently haven't been folded into
subsequent editions.

This question has never been answered. I think it's quite relevant to whether we can accept the patch or not.

Florian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]