This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.25 machine status?
- From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>
- To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf at mellanox dot com>, Samuel Thibault <samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org>, David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 12:16:59 +0530
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.25 machine status?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <0c57f85b-2a91-8f0d-1de4-29c77482393b@redhat.com> <61398d75-6e2e-6729-8322-66a67e73e9f1@gotplt.org> <a39d957c-9873-5c2c-b4ea-1c19216b914f@redhat.com>
On Wednesday 01 February 2017 11:15 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> As a fallback, we could simply strip GLIBC_TUNABLES for HAVE_TUNABLES as
> well. This would reduce most of the risk from this change.
It needs to be correct because it breaks compatibility between
MALLOC_CHECK_ and glibc.malloc.check.
Siddhesh