This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Patch 2 of 2 for ILP32 aarch64
- From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey at caviumnetworks dot com>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 11:59:24 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Patch 2 of 2 for ILP32 aarch64
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Steve dot Ellcey at cavium dot com;
- References: <1487781046.2866.153.camel@caviumnetworks.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702221702490.8704@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 17:03 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/bits/stat.h and
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/bits/statfs.h are missing
> descriptive
> comments on their first line before the copyright notice.
Just to be clear on the format, is there any preference/standard in
having the description be a seperate comment than the copyright notice
and in having a blank line or not between the description and the
copyright notice. I see a mix of options in existing code.
1)
/* description */
/* Copyright....
2)
/* description
Copyright....
3)
/* description */
/* Copyright....
4)
/* description
Copyright.....
I guess my preference is number 4 but I haven't been consistent in
using that format.
Steve Ellcey
sellcey@cavium.com