This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Basic requirements for supporting OS and machine ports.
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf at mellanox dot com>, Chung-Lin Tang <chunglin_tang at mentor dot com>, Steven Munroe <sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com>, Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien at aurel32 dot net>, Adam Conrad <adconrad at 0c3 dot net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:03:41 -0400
- Subject: Re: Basic requirements for supporting OS and machine ports.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <c501b05e-3ae1-5bc8-b5a7-b6c2dabb98bc@redhat.com> <1492545822.8014.8.camel@redhat.com>
On 04/18/2017 04:03 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 09:47 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> (c) If your OS and machine port have neither build-many-glibcs.py nor a buildbot
>> then machine maintainers are *not* responsible for ensuring anything beyond
>
> I suppose this should be all maintainers, not just machine maintainers.
Yes, that's right. It should read:
(c) If your OS and machine port have neither build-many-glibcs.py nor a buildbot
then maintainers are *not* responsible for ensuring anything beyond
a sensible and logically consistent change to those OS and machine ports
that do not meet the basic requirements. This can include creating stubbed out
files for machine maintainers to eventually fill in with implementation details.
--
Cheers,
Carlos.