This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: AArch64 ILP32 abi in glibc


On 07/07/2017 05:08 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Florian Weimer wrote:
> 
>> Can we do without a branch instead?  I don't see how things are simpler
>> for non-ILP32 developers without the branch.  I expected that I'll deal
> 
> I think any port in master should build with mainline upstream kernel 
> headers (and other components), or at least a kernel port we can be 
> confident will be upstream in the next release or two.

My comments were based on the Hurd and NaCl experiences.  I don't want
another port which is effectively out of tree, but with an expectation
to keep things going there.  If we can pretend that the port does not
exist, that's fine, but why would we coordinate this matter on
libc-alpha if that's the goal?

Thanks,
Florian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]