This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Sorry, I'm not getting my idea across. Let me try again. I'm thinking, something that tests a size *before* we consider it in the context of a chunk, such as this one: https://www.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-10/msg01202.html One might also consider certain combinations of the three low order bits, like setting both the A (arena) and M (mmap'd) bits at the same time. Even if we had such a test, though, we'd still need to carefully consider all the places we'd use it - comparing possible utility vs performance degredation.
Ah I see. That's a good check btw:-) > But please don't consider this a requirement for any pending patches, I > was just thinking out loud ;-) >So for my current patch idea, would you prefer it with or without a macro and keeping the check inside unlink or not?
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |