This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 11/03/2017 01:41 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
I think the preferred syntax is to put the attribute before the return type; after the type, it would apply to the type, and not the function, and GCC has hacks to support that, but that will only work for some types.hm.. current uses of unused attribute for the same purpose come after the return type:
I meant the preferred syntax on the GCC side. But it was just a suggestion. For the unused attribute, the distinction truly does not matter.
Thanks, Florian
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |